In 1997, Tony Blair the Prime Minister of UK went to Rio De Janeiro for the UN Earth Summit! The Summit was a discussion on how to save the Planet, this came about from a report commissioned by the UN in 1982, the discussion consisted of 179 countries and all signed up to the Agenda 21 as it became known, for more information Google, ‘The Millennium Papers’ or for a quick over view see here; http://youtu.be/TzEEgtOFFlM Agenda 21 for Dummies.
I mention this now, as there are issues going on in the UK, that bear a striking resemblance to the atrocities from the Agenda, things like suppressing the weak and unemployed, forcing them from their homes and cities. Then we have the privatisation of public services, the Health service The NHS has been taken from the public, see here for detailed information; http://youtu.be/OkTnCtg_Omk This is a report on how the NHS will look and operate when privatisation completes, the report by Lucy Reynolds, Lucy is an academic who has studied the background of the NHS in detail, learning in the process what the appalling consequences of privatisation will be.
At 1.30 (one minute thirty secs) Lucy tells how the bill will be impossible to reverse, without the government being sued. At 2.25 She tells how Nu-Labour changed rules, while in office, that enabled the Tories to bring it out now. At 3.00 Lucy informs us that we will never be informed of what is happening, as Parliament will never announce what is going on. The whole interview is an eye-opener and lasts some 73 minutes, I urge you to listen to it. Further to this bill, we are in turmoil over the EU, who as it turns out, are complicit in this and the privatisation of other public services, namely; Rail, Mail, Education Water and Police. These services will all be ran on the same model as the USA, see here for detailed information; http://www.andrewlansley.co.uk/newsevent.php?newseventid=21 This is a speech made by Adrew Lansley on the NHS in 2005, it is explicit in the way the whole set-up will work. (See also this blog; Not in my Name.)
The real danger to the working man, although we haven’t seen it yet, is the USA. At present David Cameron is in the USA tying up loose ends, one of these was forced upon him, while in America he had to issue a diktat to have a vote in the house on a referendum on the EU. This was forced by rebels in his back-benches, who wanted a promise to have the referendum set as a definite. You see, Cameron is promising something he doesn’t believe in, he just needs his MP’s in place to win him crucial votes, he can’t afford them to jump to UKIP, the anti- EU party, as this would end the dream. The USA is to become a partner of the EU in a trade deal and ALL public services within these realms will be ran on the same lines. This is evidenced here; http://youtu.be/oglwJDTHM7M again by Lucy Reynolds, the info on the USA is near the end (15 mins) but the dialogue before is very disturbing. (Again this blog; Not in my Name)
In between all of this we have a chancellor who doesn’t seem to know what he’s doing, the country is struggling for houses, the economy is trawling along the bottom and he brings out a Ponzi scheme? What else could you call a plan to give cheap loans to people, even if their credit rating is low and back it up with taxpayers money? This is obviously money for the middle tier people, who can’t get paid till new funds come in. See here for a breakdown of this story and a few other tit-bits; http://www.istream.com/news/watch/367472/Keiser-Report–May-9-2013 One must ask the question, in his last budget, why has he not allowed for any more spending till next Parliament? We need to build houses and grow the economy, but we seem to be tracking the euro? Are we suffering to save the euro and the banks? It certainly looks that way, if we build we grow, house prices come down and interests rise, this will create a big bang because there is STILL, billions tied up in property, especially around London. He needs the house bubble to continue, So, NO NEW HOMES YET! We are in a controlled austerity and we, the working man, are suffering for the rich and wealthy, this is a scandalous way to treat the nation.
The opening Paragraphs of Agenda 21 really spell everything out, if your not worried now you will be after reading this; “Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society such as the National Rifle Association, citizen militias and some members of Congress / Parliament. This segment of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a UN invasion of the United States and UK through which our individual freedom would be stripped away would actively work to defeat any elected official who joined ‘the conspiracy’ by undertaking LA21. So, we call our processes something else, such as comprehensive planning, growth management, sustainable development or smart growth. On closer examination, however, LA21 can look unfamiliar and create discomfort, as it calls for a significant reorientation of the planners’ role. It asks for a change of orientation from technocratic to political (not partisan). This fundamental difference has not been well recognized by the planning profession, or those who employ planners. Not too surprisingly, NGOs and individuals have expectations for changed institutional behaviours consistent with the principles of LA21. However, even among those progressive local authorities committed to making LA21 work, the public’s expectation for different corporate and professional behaviours is seldom being met. In its construction LA21 makes clear through its call for involvement, empowerment and devolution of power that planning is primarily a political activity that relies upon science and planning techniques. Most rational planning models assume the opposite that planning is primarily technical with political consequences. With this shift in emphasis, the customary relationship between planners and the planning profession, the public and politicians changes significantly. Planning done under LA21 should: Change community decisions about what can or will be discussed and who has a right to be at the table. LA21 threatens the role and power of traditionally empowered groups.”
It is the USA / EU merger that brings the whole AGENDA 21 scenario frighteningly to life and the concept is so scary it’s unbelievable, I now understand why the USA wanted to bring in gun control and they bought so many rounds of ammunition, 1.6 billion rounds, ten per head, http://youtu.be/77UadZRL6M4 in preparation for a civil war? Also, the UK want to introduce water cannon, while setting a precedent of placing armed police on the streets of a town, LUTON! http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/armed-police-patrol-luton-shocking-1892030?plckFindCommentKey=CommentKey%3A22d250bf-91d4-495d-9598-9b7179cc647c&plcktb=M1EdWWwGYEZ-fGtZbAwkDw2 This would be to protect themselves when the people start to fight back, to retain what is rightfully theirs and stop their government from stealing it away!
UN Agenda 21 is advancing at a mighty pace in Australia and almost no one is yet aware of its existence. Although farmers are being forced off their lands by numerous property ‘overlays’ (up to 9 restrictions on a property), the rest of the people don’t connect the dots because press censorship and government censorship on this subject is absolute. I just read that Missouri is about to ban ICLEI and Agenda 21. Go Missouri, and well done Alabama..they will be back by stealth, watch your backs.
“….after Agenda 21 was adopted, an international organization known as the “International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives” (ICLEI) was established to help implement the goals of Agenda 21 in local communities.”
Interesting body is the International Council for Local Environment Initiatives (ICLEI) who number among their membership the following in the UK:
- Birmingham City Council
- Bristol City Council
- City of Glasgow
- Craigavon Borough Council
- Greater London Authority
- Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
- Newcastle City Council
- Royal Haskoning (Associate Member)
- Woking Borough Council
The fourth version of the Covenant, issued on September 22, 2010, was written to control all development tied to the environment, “the highest form of law for all human activity“. The Covenant’s 79 articles, described in great detail in 242 pages, take Sustainable Development principles described in Agenda 21 and transform them into global law, which supersedes all constitutions including the U.K. and USA Constitution.
All signatory nations, including the U.K. and USA, would become centrally planned, socialist countries in which all decisions would be made within the framework of Sustainable Development.
Essentially what this proposed environmental covenant does is it takes the sustainable development principles underlying Agenda 21 and turns them into global constitutional law. All parties to this new constitution would be forced to turn their nations into centrally-planned societies where all decisions about everything are evaluated within the framework of sustainable development.
Finally, for information on the EU if you’re not sure which way to go, IN / OUT, have a look at this clip with Marta Andresson asking the right questions; http://youtu.be/R8Epv-v_WmY there is also this, by Sir James Goldsmith; http://youtu.be/AZYcjVC2rRQ explaining the true reasons of the EU from day one!